Saturday, June 23, 2018

Healthful Fish Is a Myth

Terri MacLeod of Access Hollywood and I recently discussed just how toxic fish can be. Since there are many myths about fish being healthful, I want to share Ms. MacLeod’s column on bad fats and fish:

Healthy Hollywood is still reeling over the idea that fish might not be the best thing for your diet.

After years of eating and loving fish, I was in shock when vegan guru and author of “Power Foods For The Brain,” Dr. Neal Barnard, compared fish to a “low tar cigarette.”

My love of fish just went up in smoke!

Healthy Hollywood met up with Dr. Barnard at the “Nutrition and Brain” summit held recently in Washington, D.C. where I was having breakfast with him and chatting about my favorite subject - “healthy/healing” nutrition. Then, his head-spinning proclamation about fish suddenly capsized my appetite for all things from sea.

“Many people have gotten the idea they should be eating fish and fish you could say maybe a better choice than beef. Fish is somewhat lower in fat, depending on how it’s prepared, and the fats are more of the goods fats, which are the omega-3’s, but and this is a big ‘BUT’…,” exclaimed Dr. Barnard.

Dr. Barnard favors a vegan/plant-based diet in order to achieve optimal health and decrease one’s risk for dementia. But, even Dr. Oz, was shocked when Dr. Barnard declared fish a diet don’t on his show back in March 2013. “As group, people who eat fish have more weight problems and have a higher risk of diabetes, compared with people who skip animal products altogether,” he declared to Healthy Hollywood.

In addition, all that hype about good fats in fish, like salmon, is another bottom-feeder, according to Dr. Barnard, who goes on to explain that 40% of salmon is fat and that 70 to 80% of that fat is not good for us. “Most of the fat in fish is not omega-3’s and it doesn’t do your body any good.”

Or, does it do any good for your waistline. “Every gram of fat is 9 calories. And, you don’t have to do a lot of math before you realize I’m not going to lose any weight if I’m eating salmon. Doctors will say that’s the point, ‘it is fatty fish’ and you want the fish for the good fat, but what they’re not realizing is only a tiny fraction of it is good fish. So, I wouldn’t go there,” explain Dr. Barnard.

Besides, the bad fat, fish can also be toxic, with dangerous levels of mercury and other pollutants, adding, “Keep in mind where fish are from. They live in what has become a kind of human sewer – the oceans and waterways.”

So, whether you take Dr. Barnard’s bait is up to you, but he insists it’s good to keep the dialogue going on our food system and keep in mind we are what we eat.

From Dr Barnard's Blog at http://www.pcrm.org/nbBlog/index.php/healthful-fish-is-a-myth

Monday, May 21, 2018

Dementia Fact


Tuesday, January 16, 2018

7 Reasons I’m a Christian Vegan

“Why are you vegan?”
It’s one of the first questions people ask when they discover that I don’t eat or wear animal products, buy products that are tested on animals, or pay to see animals used in entertainment. And while there are more and more Christian vegans (look for the guy at the church potluck with a plate of raw vegetables, hovering over the dish he brought that has a little vegan-friendly protein), we’re still a bit of an anomaly in the church.
Because we church folk like to eat, the question often comes up around a meal. And, honestly, I feel a little awkward telling you about how that chicken leg you’re eating belonged to a bird who was raised in filth, had her beak hacked off when she was a baby, was probably crippled before her six-week-birthday, and then died a terrifying and gruesome death.
So, here’s “why vegan” in a nutshell. If you’re like me and have already adopted a more compassionate lifestyle, but aren’t sure how to talk about it to your church friends, this list can help you, too.
  1. Eating meat and dairy products supports cruelty to animals, and I don’t want to do that.
  2. Expanding on that—when it comes to using animals to satisfy human desires or to feed human greed, animal welfare will always lose to profit.
  3. The Bible tells us that Eden was vegan and paints a portrait of a new Jerusalem where death and crying and mourning will be no more. If we were vegan then and will be vegan again, why not begin to live into that Kingdom promise now?
  4. The movement of God is towards reconciliation—reconciliation of humans to God, to one another, and to the rest of creation. I want to move with the Spirit of God.
  5. Jesus’ life demonstrated again and again that we were to reach beyond what was comfortable and love the ones who were least like us. Given the systemic way we use and abuse animals today, I think that charge of neighborly love should apply to the furry, finned, and feathered as much as it applied to the leper, prostitute, and Gentile then.
  6. Eating meat and dairy is bad for the environment. This is especially damaging to our brothers and sisters in rural communities and in the global south, where the brunt of the effects of climate change (of which animal agriculture is a main contributing factor) are felt.
  7. Eating meat and dairy is a terrible waste of resources. We use far more than our fair share of grain, water, air, and land when we consume diets that include animal products.
There are a number of excellent resources for Christians who want to learn more about how their use of animals impacts the whole world. You can start by checking out ESA’s articles on animal protection.

http://www.evangelicalsforsocialaction.org/creation-care/animals/7-reasons-im-a-christian-vegan/

The Christian Basis for Veganism

Most Christians in the Western Hemisphere eat meat. Though a small vegetarian/vegan minority exists, for the most part Christianity in North and South America is a meat-eating religion.
When asked about the morality of killing animals for food, the response from most self-described Christians is almost always the same: the Bible teaches that humans have dominion over animals, and that killing them for food or any other service to humans is allowable. However, despite the general acceptance of this ethos of domination within Western Christianity, the fact remains that when all scriptural passages pertaining to animal welfare are viewed within the larger context of the Christian message of grace, atonement, and mercy developed throughout the Bible, there exists an even stronger argument that promotes the humane and compassionate treatment of animals. As a matter of fact, a very strong biblical case for complete abstinence from meat and all animal products has been taught for years.
Contrary to the teachings of Augustine and Aquinas, some of the most celebrated Christian leaders, theologians, and teachers of all time were/are vegetarians who espoused the view that meat consumption is contrary to the Biblical message of love and compassion and is not healthy, either for the individual or for the planet.


Tolstoy Christian
“If a man aspires towards a righteous life, his first act of abstinence is from injury to animals.” – Leo Tolstoy (photo: public domain)

These acclaimed leaders include John Wesley; Salvation Army founders William and Catherine Booth; American pastor Tony Campolo; theologian and physician Albert Schweitzer; Seventh-day Adventist Church founder Ellen G. White; Leo Tolstoy; St. John Chrysostom; St. Clement of Alexandria; and St. Basil. Famous Christian apologist and author C.S. Lewis and St. Francis of Assisi, though not strict vegetarians, both took great pains to teach the moral obligation of Christians to treat all animals with compassion and mercy. Even the iconic Fred Rogers of the public-television program Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood, an ordained Presbyterian minister, was a vegetarian and avoided any products derived from animals.

















Conflicting biblical statements about animals

There are hundreds of conflicting passages in the Bible concerning how animals fit into Creation and how we as humans are to interact with them. Throughout the Old Testament, texts describing animal sacrifice and animal subservience (Genesis 9:2-6, Deuteronomy 14:4, I Kings 18:25-38, Exodus 12:1-13) intermix with other verses about the purity of animals and their ability to reason and praise God in His glory. (Job 12:7-10, Psalms 36:6-7, Isaiah 43:20, Psalms 148:7-10). Chapter 22 in the Book of Numbers tells the interesting story of the Israelite Balaam, whose faithful donkey sees an angel with its sword drawn blocking the road and wisely chooses to turn off into a field.
Because Balaam is impure and can’t see the angel, he beats the donkey with his staff, imploring her to get back on the road. After numerous attempts and beatings to no avail, the donkey actually speaks to Balaam and explains that if he would open his mind and his eyes, he would see that there is a very practical and urgent reason why, after years of service, she has abruptly stopped. At this point, the angel becomes visible to Balaam (who falls to the ground trembling) and sternly asks him, “Why have you beaten your donkey? If she had not turned away, I would certainly have killed you by now, but spared her.”
In the New Testament the contradiction of the teachings continues. In numerous verses, animal imagery is used to reflect not only righteous attributes but even God himself. In countless passages, Jesus is referred to as the Lamb of God. Mark 1:9-11 says the Holy Spirit appeared as a dove: “As Jesus was coming up out of the water, He saw heaven being torn open and the Spirit descending on Him in the form of a dove.”


photo: Pete Crosbie / Willowite Animal Sanctuary
photo: Pete Crosbie / Willowite Animal Sanctuary

In Matthew 23:37, Jesus compares his own love of Jerusalem to that of a mother hen gathering her chicks: “How often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing.” In John 10:14, Jesus simply says, “I am the good shepherd. I know my sheep and my sheep know me.” However, according to Luke 24, Jesus ate fish with the disciples. On another occasion he worked a miracle so they could bring in a huge catch in their nets. John 21 even has Jesus cooking fish for breakfast over an open fire.

Biblical hermeneutics helps resolve textual conflicts

So, how is it possible that so many notable Christian theologians and scholars like John Wesley, Tony Campolo, and Leo Tolstoy have concluded over the years that the Bible teaches abstinence from animal products? The answer lies in a basic, but very important, scholarly discipline that few Christians outside of seminaries discuss very often. It is this: biblical hermeneutics.
Broadly defined, biblical hermeneutics is the study of deducing eternal biblical truths from texts which were written by authors at a specific moment in time, within a specific cultural and moral context, for a specific audience, and with a specific intent. Biblical hermeneutics analyzes all the historical factors of these writings and searches for eternal truths that last beyond the culture or time in which the texts were written.


Christian
Monk transcribing manuscript. Shutterstock / Pana

Scholars have known for thousands of years that the Bible is full of literal and thematic contradictions from book to book and from passage to passage. In many of the historical books of the Old Testament, as well as in the Gospels, major discrepancies exist in various reportings of the same event. Elements of the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus, for example, are reported somewhat differently in all four Gospels.
However, amidst these inconsistencies that naturally result from the different historical and literary contexts in which they were written, there are unmistakable themes that emerge when all elements of hermeneutic criticism are taken into consideration. A poignant example of this is the biblical account of the institution of slavery. Most modern-day Christians would be surprised to know that not once in the Bible is slavery condemned. As a matter of fact, throughout both the Old and New Testaments, slavery is fully accepted as a legitimate economic institution. Over and over, slaves are admonished to obey their masters even if they are harshly treated.


“Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.” (Peter 2:18)
“Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.” (Peter 2:18)

Today one would be very hard pressed to find any church leader or scholar, brutally conservative, wildly liberal or anywhere in between, who would endorse the idea that one human being has the right to own another human being. (For that matter, I can’t imagine coming across any rank-and-file Christians who would endorse slavery, either.) While we no longer champion the validity of the institution of slavery, until a mere 150 years ago countless numbers of Christians believed otherwise. The dramatic doctrinal change that we now take for granted occurred gradually over the course of the last 1,500 years as biblical scholars hermeneutically wrestled their way to the conclusion that the overall message of the Bible, culminated by Christ’s atonement for all people regardless of race or gender, prohibits the ownership of one human over another, despite specific biblical passages that contend the exact opposite.
Another hermeneutic transformation that has taken place in the Church regards the role of women. Again, most relevant passages throughout both the Old and New Testaments relegate womens’ role in the church to an auxiliary or nonexistent one. The apostle Paul on numerous occasions speaks quite bluntly about the subject. “Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.” (I Corinthians 14:34-35). He reiterates the same sentiments in a letter to Timothy (I Timothy 2:8). However, over the course of the last 500 years, biblical scholars have taken into consideration the historical and literary context in which Paul was writing and began to come to a very different conclusion about the role of women in the Church hierarchy in relation to the overall spirit of the Bible, not the actual text of the Bible. Polygamy is another example of biblical hermeneutic change over the course of history.

Hermeneutics applied to Bible verses about animals



Edward Hicks, "Peaceable Kingdom." Public domain.
Edward Hicks, “Peaceable Kingdom.” Public domain.

No respected biblical scholar would deny that, according to the biblical account as laid forth in Genesis, the Garden of Eden (and hence the essence of God’s vision of Creation) was vegan. Genesis 1:29-30 states, “Then God said, ‘I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food.’”
Likewise, virtually all scholars agree that the prophetic passages in the book of Isaiah describe the eternal Kingdom of God as a place where there will be absolutely no killing of any kind and all facets of existence will be at peace: “The wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion and the yearling together…. The cow will feed with the bear, their young will lie down together, and the lion will eat straw like the ox. The infant will play near the cobra’s den, the young child will put its hand into the viper’s nest. They will neither harm nor destroy on my holy mountain, for the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea.” (Isaiah 11: 6-9).
Through the Genesis description of the Garden of Eden and the Isaiah account of the eternal Kingdom of God, we vividly sense that God desires a world without killing. The ideal has clearly been set for us. What excuse then do we have to kill animals for food or other products, when we are fully capable of leading a life without killing them and we know that we shouldn’t kill them? Moreover, it can be argued that killing another living creature goes against our human nature — the God within us. As Tolstoy said, “So strong is man’s aversion to all killing. But … by the assertion that God has allowed it, and, above all, by habit, people entirely lose this natural feeling.”


“When a human kills an animal for food, he is neglecting his own hunger for justice. Humans pray for mercy, but are unwilling to extend it to others. Why should they then expect mercy from God? It's unfair to expect something that you are not willing to give. It is inconsistent." - Isaac Bashevis Singer
“When a human kills an animal for food, he is neglecting his own hunger for justice. Man prays for mercy, but is unwilling to extend it to others. Why should he then expect mercy from God? It’s unfair to expect something that you are not willing to give. It is inconsistent.” – Isaac Bashevis Singer (photo of lamb meat farm: Animal Equality)

Living a life that best respects God’s creation

In researching this article, I interviewed Dr. Richard Alan Young, a biblical scholar and author of the book Is God a Vegetarian? Time and again during our conversation, Young came back to the fact that in biblical times, the horrors of modern factory farming and vivisection (the use of animals in scientific experiments and product testing) did not exist. He maintains that in light of the unimaginable suffering inflicted upon His creatures by these barbaric practices, there is no way a merciful God could condone either.
Moreover, he contends that, because a plant-based diet is extremely beneficial for the human body as well as the planet, there is no excuse for us to eat meat. Scientific research has shown that, on average, vegetarians and vegans lead longer, healthier lives, and has linked meat consumption with heart disease, colon cancer, and many other health problems. In 2006, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization reported that the world’s meat-producing industry contributes more greenhouse gases (which cause global warming) into the Earth’s atmosphere than the emissions of all cars, trucks, airplanes, and trains put together. Animal agriculture is also the main factor in deforestation and water pollution throughout the world. Converting plant food into meat wastes approximately 78 percent of the protein, up to 96 percent of the calories, and all of the fiber.
It is no wonder that more church leaders are finally beginning to view the production and consumption of meat as an outright sin. Eating meat is the worst way imaginable to sustain our bodies and our planet. It destroys both, and just as importantly, it inflicts incalculable anguish on the lives of innocent animals who were created by God to enjoy their freedom just as much as we humans.
The Bible implores us to produce fruit with our repentance (no pun intended). Virtually the entire New Testament is based upon the idea that as sanctified members of the body of Christ who have experienced God’s grace, Christians are called to lead a godly and righteous life to the best of their ability. The righteous life, not surprisingly, is also, I believe, the most healthy, compassionate and fulfilling life. And it is merely a matter of time before the condemnation of meat consumption and any ill treatment of animals becomes a widely held doctrinal tenet of the Christian Church.
______________________________________
Author’s Note: For historical context I mention both vegetarianism and veganism throughout this article, but it should be noted that there is a big difference between the two. “Strict vegetarianism” is the same as dietary veganism: abstinence from all animal-derived foods. But today, the term vegetarian is largely interchangeable with “lacto-ovo vegetarian,” or one who consumes dairy and eggs but no meat. However, dairy and egg farming inflict immeasurable suffering on billions of cows and chickensevery year. As noted in the article, it is clear that the Garden of Eden was vegan and that animals were not exploited in any way. Ethical veganism, the avoidance of all animal products — including food, clothing, cosmetics, and any other products derived from animal exploitation — is the purest way to honor God and his Creation. It is not only an outward expression of compassion, grace, and justice, it is the healthiest lifestyle for our bodies, community, and the planet. It is the way intended by God.

Why Veganism Is Outpacing Meat-Eating For The First Time In History

A few weeks ago, I ended up racing a friend of mine who thought he could beat me in a footrace. Yes, it was as ridiculous and childish as it sounds, but bear with me a second. During the race, I remember hearing my other friend, who was umpiring the race, yell ‘vegan for the win!’ as I crossed the finished line. We all laughed, of course, but that proclamation got my mind going. I started doing research and was as surprised as I was happy to find out that veganism, per capita, was outpacing meat-eating – and it wasn’t even close. These are the reasons I discovered as to why.
Global Awareness
I remember hearing that a crew of Danish politicians at VeganerUdfordringen had decided to go vegan to raise awareness for the health and environmental purposes of a plant-based diet. Around that same time, a group of 24 European parliament members signed a letter advising Europe to make the move to a plant-based diet for health and long-term sustainability.
All over the world people are awakening to the reality that consumption of animal products and health and environment are all innately linked. Meaning, the world is inching closer and closer to the plant-based revolution that was predicted last year by Alphabet and its ‘little known’ parent company Google.
And speaking of that small company, Google has stated that since 2014 search for the terms “vegan” or “vegetarian” has continued to increase all over the world.
Athletics
(Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)
Celebrities are cool and all, but when more superstar level athletes than ever start to come out and vocally proclaimed their vegan devotion, that speaks louder than anything – because, you know, their bodies are their business. NBA Superstars like Kyrie Irving and Damian Lillard; to NFL all-pro tackle Trent Williams; to the group of vegan athletes that won 32 medals at the Naturally Fit Games – and the list just keeps getting longer. They know that plant-based protein is the better choice for building muscle and conditioning – and that’s major!
Health
The undisputed number one reason most people go vegan is for their own health benefits. Once people’s mortality comes into play and they learn that vegan food comes without the harmful elements found in animal products that lead to disease and inflammation – they start listening a little more intently.
Money Talks
Like many things in this world, the rise of vegan awareness can be traced directly to money. The impact of meat consumption is driving demand for meat-free products and substitutes. As veganism continues to go more and more mainstream, the convenience of it has risen with the demand. Many restaurants and cafes have made a hard left turn and decided veganism is where the future is going – so they should too. Seriously, there are now dairy-free ice-cream parlors, 24-hour drive-thru vegan restaurants, and vegan pizza joints – for goodness sakes. It’s actually a little bit insane how far veganism has come, from a business standpoint. Especially when you hear that, say, the largest dairy company in New York completely ditched dairy for plant-based options. Like wtf?!?! But it shows you exactly how loudly money speaks.
Stats
Some people will never be convinced unless there are statistics staring back at them. So for those hard to please people, I present to them this:
So, in closing, Veganism for the win! 🙂
About the authors: Alex and Gerry are the co-founders of Vegr (GoVegr.com). Together they are looking to inspire and unite the vegan community through memes, blogs, videos, and information.

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Thursday, November 09, 2017

Surprising New Study: Stents Don’t Work for Chest Pain

In a shock to cardiologists around the world, a new study reveals that one of the most common medical uses of stents—to relieve chest pain in stable heart patients—may not work. Every year, more than half a million people worldwide receive stents for this purpose.
A stent is a tiny mesh tube that doctors insert into narrowed or weakened arteries to prop them open. The procedure saves lives for people in the midst of a heart attack, but it’s also prescribed for stable heart patients with angina—the chest pain and tightness caused by limited blood flow to the heart. Even pain-free patients with arterial blockages sometimes get stents, and cost of the procedure starts at about $11,000 for people without insurance.
Patients often report relief from the procedure, but the new study, published last week in The Lancet, found no significant difference in pain relief among patients treated with stents compared to those treated with a placebo procedure.
In the randomized, controlled experiment involving 200 patients in the United Kingdom with severe narrowing of one artery, about half were treated with stents, and the other half underwent a placebo procedure. All were given drugs to reduce the risk of a heart attack and prevent blood clots. Neither the patients nor the researchers observing them during the six-week study knew who received stents and who did not.
After six weeks, all the patients reported relief in angina symptoms, and all showed an improvement on treadmill tests—regardless of whether or not they had received a stent.
“All cardiology guidelines should be revised,” wrote David L. Brown, MD, of the Washington University School of Medicine and Rita F. Redberg of the University of California, San Francisco, in an editorial in the same issue of The Lancet.
“Several randomized trials have clearly shown that stents and angioplasties don’t prolong life or prevent heart attacks in stable patients. Now, we know that they don’t reduce angina either,” wrote Dean Ornish, MD, clinical professor of medicine at the University of California of San Francisco, commenting on a New York Times report of the study.
“In contrast, comprehensive lifestyle changes cause a 91 percent reduction in angina in only a few weeks, reverse the progression of coronary artery blockages, and cause a 400 percent improvement in blood flow at a fraction of the costs, and the only side-effects are good ones,” added Ornish, who is also founder and president of the Preventive Medicine Research Institute in Sausalito, California.
sourced from https://www.forksoverknives.com/surprising-new-study-stents-dont-work-chest-pain/